MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY. AN INDIVIDUAL APPROACH.
PL
REOXY / Research

Evidence you can examine.

Results matter together with their context: sample size, comparison method and study limitations. Below are selected publications referenced by the manufacturer.

2024Doehner et al.

Controlled, non-randomised study · n = 145

IHHT in rehabilitation for people with long COVID

The publication reported a greater improvement in six-minute walking distance in the IHHT group.

Context: Pilot study; the lack of randomisation limits causal interpretation.

Publication Doehner et al.
2018Tuter et al.

Randomised controlled trial · n = 127

Conditioning before coronary artery bypass surgery

Postoperative markers of myocardial injury were assessed. The results concern a specific protocol and patient group.

Context: Single-centre study; results should not be generalised to every IHHT application.

Publication Tuter et al.
2017Bayer et al.

Randomised controlled trial · n = 34

IHHT within a geriatric rehabilitation programme

Cognitive performance and exercise capacity were assessed alongside multimodal training.

Context: Small sample; treatment was an addition to a broader programme.

Publication Bayer et al.

How should these findings be read?

Available studies cover different populations and protocols, often with small samples. Results do not guarantee an outcome for an individual patient. Device indications are defined by its current documentation.

Manufacturer’s bibliography
ECSS / LAUSANNE 2026

Research keeps moving.

The supplied congress brochure describes a study of 36 cardiac rehabilitation patients. We treat it as a conference report, with its limitations preserved.

The numerically larger VO₂peak increase did not reach conventional between-group statistical significance (p = 0.098). No reported adverse events in this study does not imply an absence of risk in every application.

YOUR NEXT STEP

Start with a considered plan.

A few answers. Your implementation brief. A focused conversation.